Modern pharmaceutical supply chains are global and complex. The pandemic has clearly demonstrated the risks of supply-chain disruptions, and the importance of building greater resilience into supply chains so they are better able to withstand shocks.

In addition, the threat of climate change has called into question the environmental sustainability of long supply chains, both in terms of emissions from transportation and in terms of carbon leakage from countries with strict climate policies.

We put some of YOUR questions on this topic to a panel of experts:

💬 Giacomo Mattino, Head of Unit “Food, Retail, Health”, DG GROW, European Commission

💬 Chantal Friebertshäuser, Managing Director, MSD Germany

Should EU medicine supply chains be shorter and more sustainable? Could shorter pharmaceutical supply chains help reinforce European strategic autonomy in medicines? Let us know your thoughts and comments in the form below and we’ll take them to policymakers and experts for their reactions!

Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Commission. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.



6 comments Post a commentcomment

What do YOU think?

  1. avatar
    EU-Reform Proactive

    I have the least worry about the internal workings, logistics, & obvious top managerial skills of one of the biggest and most well-run American multinational pharmaceuticals- known as Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD outside the US).

    I rather look at their financial performance- which reveals much more. Of course, the EU regulatory pen is always close by.

    https://www.merck.com/news/merck-announces-second-quarter-2022-financial-results/

    But- much greater problems exist in industries hit by serious global supply chain shortages (never mind ‘shorter chains’ etc.) which has most people worried about how best to survive this coming winter. Forgotten?

    It includes energy (gas & oil), semiconductors, automobiles, industries, food manufacturing, & supplies- to name just a few.

    As we know, energy powers the economy- which guarantees employment, earnings, & consumption. Which in part contributes to a reliable food supply and hopefully guarantees everyone’s survival.

    The usual disrupters are gone wrong political assumptions and risky investments- in extreme cases gone made politicians & war while forgetting for a moment Mother Nature’s revenge & extravaganzas.

  2. avatar
    Paweł

    Uważam, że zarówno Unia Europejska jak i koncerny farmaceutyczne powinny odpierdzielić się od medycyny.

  3. avatar
    André

    La langue européenne c’est la traduction! Alors stop à l’invasion de l’anglo-saxon!

  4. avatar
    Sylvain

    Parlez français et non l’angloy qui a quitté l’Union 🥳🇨🇵✨ !

  5. avatar
    Lili

    Health is very important and sick populations cost so much the societies!
    Everything we eat shall be of high quality, including medicine and health treatments!

  6. avatar
    Chris

    Que l’UE s’occupe de ses affaires, l’approvisionnement en médicaments sont les affaires des états.

Your email will not be published

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Notify me of new comments. You can also subscribe without commenting.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

More debate series – Healthcare Next – A citizen-centric approach View all

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Privacy Policy unless you have disabled them. You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.