Space is back! Fifty years after the first manned mission to the moon, people are once again enthusiastically cheering on astronauts as they embark on their journey to the International Space Station (ISS). In the 1950s and 1960s, space travel was dominated by the competition between the United States and the Soviet Union. Today there are even more interested parties: Besides the US and Russia, China, India, Israel, and even private companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin. What role should Europe play in this gaggle of space players?

Many European countries have their own space ambitions, but they could not keep up with the budgets of NASA or Soviet spaceflight. That is why the European Space Agency (ESA) was founded in 1975 to coordinate European space activities. Its mission is to “provide for and promote, for exclusively peaceful purposes, cooperation among European States in the field of space science and technology and their applications in space, in order that they may be used for scientific purposes and for operational space application systems.” How successful is ESA in fulfilling this objective?

What do our readers think? You sent us questions and comments, which we passed on to a space expert at an event organised by our sister think tank Friends of Europe: Eric Morel de Westgaver, Director of European, Legal and International Affairs at the European Space Agency.

First, our reader Marcel sent us this comment:

Space research that serves people is always good. That’s why I welcome research by private individuals who don’t have war and armaments on their minds, but rather [care about space exploration] for people.

One thing above all is important to our reader Serina:

The important thing is to go back to the basics of a treaty that was once concluded (on the subject of outer space). And keep to it without any ifs and buts!

You can see how Eric Morel de Westgaver responded in the video at the top of this post.

What should Europe’s role be in space? Should more Europeans invest in space? Are international actors abiding by the Outer Space Treaty? Let us know your thoughts and comments in the form below and we’ll take them to policymakers and experts for their reactions!

IMAGE CREDITS: NASA. Portrait: ESA-Stephane Corvaja
Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Commission. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

21 comments Post a commentcomment

  1. avatar

    For her to return safe and sound !

  2. avatar

    It can’t be a leader in foreign policy, energy and so many more, and it dreams of becoming a leader in space?

  3. avatar

    There is millions of EU citizens living in poverty, that literally have nothing to eat and these ignorants want to be leaders in space? For what benefit?

  4. avatar

    You are asking this question as if it’s a matter of simply deciding to do it. It’s not. There are 5 steps to accomplish something:
    1. You have to want it.
    2. You have to know how to do it.
    3. You have to be able to do it.
    4. You have to try it.
    5. It has to happen.
    Most people usually fail at step 3 and many of them on step 2. Europe with its space ambitions would probably fail at step 3 at best.

  5. avatar

    I think we should certainly fight by any means possible the take-over of everything and the public space by the super-rich, oligarchs, plutocrats and the likes. This is the real threat. As for going to space, why not, I thought we were already in space. Controlled privatisation is better than militarisation; that at least is for sure.

  6. avatar

    Yes, Europe should take its place over research in all fields

  7. avatar

    Why are you wasting our money exploring Space? First, help citizens, and if there is any money left spend it on space.

    • avatar
      JT HK

      This is reasonable in the sense of priority when Europe is in great instability stirred up by the Russia and Ukraine conflict. However, I have just discovered from a Chinese video that one important mission of the space technology is to improve the agricultural production. In this sense, exploring the space for peaceful means, in a long run would benefit the country and even the whole world.

  8. avatar
    EU-Reform Proactive

    Sorry- rather late than never.

    ESA- – is a 22 member strong European international- intergovernmental org. & a valuable contributor to global space exploration and is to its participating European member states what NASA is to its US citizens.

    ESA is already a leader in European/global space exploration and an asset to its national member states! Is there an agenda behind such an innocent question?

    My concern:

    The initial aim of the EU was to make the independent European Space Agency (ESA) an agency of the EU by 2014“.
    Enough reasons to be alert & cautious!

    “In June 2021, the ESA Director General called a group of independent, high-level advisors to assess the economic, societal and POLITICAL role of space in an evolving global context and against emerging challenges.
    The mandate of the High-Level Advisory group was to advise the ESA Director General on directions and actions for ESA to realise ambitious goals, together with OTHER stakeholders, serving the future of Europe and its citizens. The present report is a summary of our deliberations and our recommendations to the ESA Director General”

    Decisions on whether to hand over ESA to total/partial EU supranational (political) control or full privatisation should be left to the 22 European founding nations of ESA- not to some globalist elites & bankers or EU political Shinigami.

    To “accelerate” ESA’s progress means- more funds for ESA.

    From whom/where & on what terms remains to be explained! Or did I miss that? Surely, ESA’s national members are capable enough to figure that out.

    With a slogan- “Forward to the moon”- propelled by science & scientists and so far with minimal political interference/advice by their national owners- why the sudden need for outside “Advisors”?

    We know that some national politicians are overworked to outsource their combined thinking- and in dire need of outside advisers.

    What may be the “(comparative) advantage” whether funded directly from the budget of its combined 22 ESA sovereign nations (+any other derived income/donors)- plus an open membership invite to more European nations-
    via a political middleman- like the EU? Probably producing less funding for the actual cause due to additional bureaucracy & advisory costs- financed or borrowed on behalf of its national members- only with an EU sticker attached?

    Does the EU- (“Europe”) genuinely care about science & research, or is it mainly an opportunity to add more political competencies & control?

    Below is an article- “Boon or burden? What has the EU ever done for science?”

    I note that neither ESA/Europe nor US/NASA are partner/funding countries in the greatest future science project- called the “SKA Observatory”? A truly international mega endeavour of 14 nations- which surprisingly includes China.

    Australia: Department of Industry and Science
    Canada: National Research Council
    China: Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China
    France: National Center for Scientific Research
    Germany: Max Planck Society
    India: National Centre for Radio Astrophysics
    Italy: National Institute for Astrophysics
    The Netherlands: Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
    Portugal: Portugal Space
    South Africa: National Research Foundation
    Spain: Ministry of Science, Innovation & Universities
    Sweden: Onsala Space Observatory
    Switzerland: École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
    United Kingdom: Science and Technology Facilities Council

    Are we discovering new political black holes vs political white holes?

  9. avatar
    JT HK

    Why people always use vocabularies demagogic politicians have been using to justify aggression and confrontation? Democracy should not be viewed from a confrontational perspective. It can be about a civilized political system to compete for good governance for the good of the people. Becoming a leader means to submit all others. Why people and countries cannot cooperate and living peacefully and respect each other? The essences of democracy on liberty, equality, fraternity, legality and of course fair election. It is clearly a multilateral system and emphasize on peaceful co-existence and cooperation. This is the reality of the global era.

  10. avatar
    JT HK

    Privatization of space is equal to open the pandora box for human destruction. We can see very clearly without the support of the government all brilliant European enterprises are vulnerable to dismemberment or takeover by foreign governments. Without the powerful intervention of the Chinese people and the Government, Huawei Meng Wanzhou would be put in jail like Alsom’s Frederic Pierucci.

  11. avatar
    JT HK

    Privatization? Why his SpaceX had approached the Chinese Tiangong? Elon Musk’s “private enterprise”, “civilian use” of satellites do not reflect its announced nature.

  12. avatar

    Would be great to figure out element 115 first 🙂

  13. avatar
    JT HK

    As we have learned that Russia has officially notified to terminate the cooperation in 2024, rather than dreaming about the space and the moon, would political leaders please open your eyes to the rocketing inflation threatening European citizens, 2 million UK adults cannot afford to eat everyday, US rising babies formula crisis, at least 14 million children suffer from severe acute malnutrition around the … poverty and lack of access to available, sufficient, nutritious food, etc.

  14. avatar

    EU /America better start with restoring it’s own economy instead talking about space race lol

  15. avatar

    Of course. Europe must have power and independance towards USA

  16. avatar

    Is nice to spend Europe money and the people hanger’s,petrol 225 per litre soon 320

    • avatar

      Freedoom is more precious.

  17. avatar

    sure… with what money? More debt?
    with what expertise? Russian? Chinese? Once the Russians are gone the ISS is a goner.

Your email will not be published

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Notify me of new comments. You can also subscribe without commenting.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Privacy Policy unless you have disabled them. You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.