Energy prices are surging across Europe. At the same time, the UN climate summit in Glasgow is almost upon us. If the European Union wants to achieve its target of being carbon-neutral by 2050, it will need to transition away from fossil fuels in a way that is fair and just.

What are some of the policies that the EU should be adopting to make sure the energy transition is fair and doesn’t push more people into energy poverty? Should low-income families be given energy-saving technologies for free? What level of support is fair if we are asking households to significantly change their energy consumption and mobility habits?

To discuss some of these question, Debating Europe recently held an online Citizens’ Panel as part of the European Climate Pact, connecting citizens with a senior EU expert for a 30-minute discussion on how to make the energy transition fair.

Answering questions from our panel of citizens was:

💬 Aleksandra TomczakMember of Cabinet of European Commission Executive Vice President Frans Timmermans. Her portfolio includes, among other things, the implementation of the Just Transition Fund; the EU’s Internal Energy Market for electricity; Gas supply and international gas corridors; Energy poverty, and EU security of supply.

Editorially independent content supported by: European Commission. See our FAQ for more details. The European Commission (DG CLIMA) does not request, collect nor otherwise process any personal data from this webpage, neither directly nor indirectly. Only aggregated and anonymised data are provided to the European Commission. Any data provided by the contributor (you) fall under the sole application of the Privacy Statement of Debating Europe who is exclusive Data Controller for all processing of personal data, if any.

 

European Commission


4 comments Post a commentcomment

What do YOU think?

  1. avatar
    Marcel

    The EU, on its own, will never be carbon neutral by 2050, unless we want to go back to caves and oxcarts.

    The world is around 1.2 C above preindustrial (mid 1700’s) and we are well on track toward 1.8 to 2.0 by mid 2100.

    No amount of money and technology will reverse 300 years of hydrocarbon-based industrialisation in 30 years, especially in today’s global economic and political model.

    The UN is trying very hard to create a global and unified GHG reduction model that goes beyond present global politics and economics, and this may be a start in understanding that no one location of the world can fix / undo the changing effects of climate change caused by GHG emissions.

    There may be some irony in all this as the so-called 3rd world countries with undeveloped economies and resources could actually be more developed from a nature and natural balance point of view when you remove the present global economic and political narrative that is presently used to define them.

    Some parts of the world will have to stay natural while other parts of the world will house the factories that will prevent us from living in caves and driving oxcarts.

    In the meantime, plan your life for the effects of climate change as there is no going back, certainly in your lifetime.

  2. avatar
    Stijn

    Taxes for poducts outside of the eu fabricated on non green ways

  3. avatar
    Kimmo

    If “clean energy” is understood as synonymous to “non-fossil”, the obvious answer is nuclear. I know this will create controversy, but let’s hear the public’s comments first.

Your email will not be published

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Notify me of new comments. You can also subscribe without commenting.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

More debate series – The European Climate Pact Project – A series of citizen debates View all

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Privacy Policy unless you have disabled them. You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.