The EU is the world’s largest exporter of live farm animals. In 2019, the EU exported around 1.6 billion live chickens, pigs, sheep, goats and cattle. Most of the trade took place within the EU, but around 230 million animals were exported to non-EU countries – and for a lot of money: in 2019, the value of the EU’s live animal export trade was more than €12 billion.

Are EU rules around the export of live animals strict enough? This is one of the questions the European Parliament’s Committee of Inquiry into the Protection of Animals during Transport is wrestling with. The recent case of a ship full of cattle stuck off the Spanish coast for three months pushed the issue into the spotlight, as have the hundreds of thousands of animal trapped by the recent blockage in the Suez canal. Meanwhile, the UK has announced it plans to ban the export of certain live animals from England and Wales. Should the EU also ban live animal exports? What impact could a ban have?

What do our readers think? We had a comment sent in from VG, arguing that the EU has quite strict animal welfare rules. But are the EU’s rules strict enough when it comes to the transport of live animals?

To get a response, we put VG’s comment to Tilly Metz, a Luxembourgish MEP who sits with the European Greens and is the Chair of the European Parliament’s Committee of Inquiry into the Protection of Animals during Transport. How would she respond?

For another perspective, we also put VG’s comment to Pekka Pesonen, the General Secretary of COPA-COGECA, which represents the interests of European farmers and agri-cooperatives. What would he say?

Let me put it this way. First of all, let’s talk about global animal welfare rules. As a European agricultural lobby, we have advocated the development of these animal welfare rules in general. But when we look at the export rules, we also have to talk about international agreements and how we deal with our trading partners. Because they have to be respected. We have no legal means to dictate anything. However, we are seeing some good trends in the sense that at least some of the European Union’s animal welfare laws have been adopted or followed by our trading partners, so we are seeing good development.

But we can never have 100 percent security in all areas, and that is always something we have to respect. You may have seen a development lately that is completely out of our hands. And, according to at least some reports, there have been some transports of live animals, I don’t know to what extent, how many animals, but then how do you ensure that animals are well fed and cared for under such conditions so that they stay healthy. that is a challenge and then of course we have to deal with it.

Next up, we had a comment sent in from Marcel arguing that people would be more conscious about the meat they buy if they were better informed about the conditions under which farm animals lived. Could information about transport conditions in animal welfare labels help consumers in their choices?

What does Pekka Pesonen think?

Last year, the German Presidency proposed a Europe-wide label for animal welfare standards. It’s not very specific yet, but we’re also working on it. We have to ask ourselves: what role does animal transport play in an animal’s life? In terms of time it is of course a very short period of time and usually towards the end of the animal’s life. Usually the most stressful part for the animal is loading and unloading during transportation. We support the development of modern equipment, such as trucks, that must meet the needs of the species. How exactly this is done depends on the species, because I would say that the focus for exporting live animals is on cattle and sheep, mostly for meat purposes.

But in any case we have to move animals within EU borders and then we have initiated solutions that meet the expectations of consumers and citizens. For example, there is a need for local products, shorter supply chains, even local mobile slaughterhouses to facilitate this. we certainly support them. But the reality in many cases is that consumers may be progressive when it comes to animal welfare standards, but when it comes to cost, many consumers tend to go for the cheaper option. So the reality of the market is also very clear, but of course we want to serve all sectors in livestock production as well as possible.

Having well-fed, healthy animals under good housing conditions is our top priority in all of Europe. But then it is also the fact that most of the farm animals are there for human consumption. They are a valuable addition to our diet. And it is in our interests to make sure that we use this natural resource efficiently, but then we have to do so with animal welfare and health in mind.

Finally, we had a comment come from Gediminas, who believes that EU-wide bans on certain practices in the food industry can have unintended consequences. Could a ban on the export of live animals also have negative consequences?

What would MEP Tilly Metz say?

Should the EU ban the export of live animals? Does the EU need stricter animal welfare laws regarding the transport of live animals? Could a ban on exports also have negative consequences? Let us know your thoughts and comments in the form below and we’ll take them to policymakers and experts!

Image Credits: Bigstock (c) benshots


22 comments Post a commentcomment

What do YOU think?

  1. avatar
    Julia

    I learned the hard way that self-preservation comes first. For many people, animal protein is essential nutrition. I cannot digest many food plant sugars such as oligosaccharides and fructans and I have oxalate phytotoxin sensitivity. High carbs give me severe migraines. When i was on the very natural vegan diet I had chronic weekly migraines and vertigo that had me on the floor. That is when i acquired a FODMAP intolerance to the sugars in beans that sent me to the ER multiple times with severe intestinal spasms. I also got an oxalate kidney stone and severe anaemia. I have none of these symptoms on an animal protein diet that is low in food plants with zero legumes. I expect the EU to have more common sense than promoting such dangerous diet advice and nonsense that disregards people’s health and right to self-preservation.

    • avatar
      Pascal

      Julia Hadjikyriacou it is about banning live transport, countries can export meat so animals don’t need to suffer during those trips. It is also about eating the food that is produced in countries. Why export pigs to China while China exports pigs to Europe?

    • avatar
      Poney

      Pascal Leclere Why?..because of this €€/$$….

    • avatar
      Pascal

      Poney Willow to stop the suffering of animals. And because not everyone will stop eating animal food (yet) including cats and dogs. Thus, humane animal treatment and no export of life animals. And yes, it is also about the €€/$$/££, suggest other ways for farmers to earn money and they may change

    • avatar
      Julia

      Pascal Leclere I see. You are right, it makes no sense to import and then export pigs. They could export their spare pigs. However i do not agree that it should be banned altogether. Animal suffering is sad, however it is the money system that is responsible for animal suffering. It is not profitable to prevent animal suffering. Banning is way too extreme to be a solution. A fair compromise must be reached.

  2. avatar
    Yvonne

    That’s a very interesting question..I’m from a country Ireland who exports live animals all the time..it’s one of our main industries..i would like to think that all our animals are as well cared for as is possible..i do think its in the interest of the farmer to send them in as best of health as is possible..and transportation has gotten much faster and safer over the years..i would like to think all animals are being cared for as well as a Prized thorough bread Horse . Honestly i don’t actually know as i have never traveled with them..but i do know that there are farms in Africa who are delighted to get our cattle or goats or sheep..so it must be working ok..i must read up on it more..greetings from Ireland ☘

  3. avatar
    Anna

    Interdiction pure et simple d’exporter des animaux vivants dont la destination est de toute façon “l’abattoir”. Le bien être animal, l’hygiène, la sécurité alimentaire, … doivent ABSOLUMENT primer sur tout le reste.

  4. avatar
    Poney

    You have the Solution.!!! .Exportation of meat ..animals slaughter in the origin country and transported by Chilled or Frozen Trucks or ocean carriers Chilled/frozen. containers ……et une Loi E U contraignante….violation=..€..0000000.. ☺

  5. avatar
    Olivia

    Disgusting the EU allows such cruelty!

  6. avatar
    Poney

    Hoops.!! E U you forgot an information.. chickens, pigs, goats, sheeps, cattles, (included their babies) or animal pregnant..??? and the horses, donkeys and ponies..foals etc… ..in EU..long distance in trucks for slaughter…in case you don’t know….Now you have no excuse so “just make it happen”..

  7. avatar
    Mariska Mestdagh

    Bien sûr, l’Europe doit supprimer ces transports ! La grandeur d’un pays – ou d’une union de pays – se mesure aussi par la façon dont elle traite les animaux. Ces transports ne sont pas dignes d’une Union européenne qui se veut progressiste !

  8. avatar
    Nathalie

    Je trouve qu’il faut appliquer le principe de suffisance. Ne pas surproduire. Car c’est bien cela que l’homme fait, il surproduit des animaux. Chaque pays devrait veiller à une bonne gestion locale, des quotas limite. Il y a beaucoup de gens qui diminuent leur consommation de viande alors il faut en produire moins et ne pas en exporter. Chaque soir les supermarchés jettent énormément de viande, quel gâchis, c’est honteux ! Des animaux morts pour rien, même pas consommés ! De plus la bataille des prix mène à de l’élevage dans de très mauvaises conditions, ce qui est intolérable. L’homme n’a pas le droit de se comporter comme cela avec les animaux. Les lois devraient donc être plus strictes afin de limiter les débordements, les maltraitances par ceux qui sont incapables d’agir correctement, avec un minimum de respect envers les animaux !

  9. avatar
    Sabine

    Interdire les transports je suis pour

  10. avatar
    Cauwenberghs

    No. But regulate and finance an efficient controll about….the conditions of that transport would be wellcome…

  11. avatar
    Mihai

    Definitely yes to stopping this horrendous practice.

Your email will not be published

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Notify me of new comments. You can also subscribe without commenting.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Privacy Policy unless you have disabled them. You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.