George Orwell believed a Socialist United States of Europe was the only truly worthwhile political objective.  He argued that most people associated “Socialism” with “higher wages, shorter hours, better houses, all-round social insurance, etc. etc.” (though he felt these benefits actually came about from the exploitation of colonial subjects). To some extent, the history of European integration has been a struggle between competing visions of Europe: the socialist Europe of worker rights and protections versus “a Europe built on Thatcherite ideals of liberty and Atlanticism”.

In reality, most EU leaders have been trying to strike a balance between these visions. In his first State of the Union speech in 2015, EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker announced he intended to create a “European Pillar of Social Rights”: “We have to step up the work for a fair and truly pan-European labour market. (…) As part of these efforts, I will want to develop a European Pillar of Social Rights, which takes account of the changing realities of Europe’s societies and the world of work. And which can serve as a compass for the renewed convergence within the euro area.”

What do our readers think? Has the balance tilted too far in favour of austerity, neoliberalism, and untrammelled free markets? We had a comment sent in from Chiara, who says she is concerned about workers being badly paid with poor job security in Europe today. How can the EU not just help create jobs, but help create high-quality jobs?

To get a response, we put Chiara’s comment to Luca Visentini, General Secretary of the European Trade Union Confederation (EUTC). What would he say?

Thank you Chiara for your question. There are two things in this question, the first one is how to create quality jobs, and of course if we don’t change the current macroeconomic policy of the European Union it will be very difficult to succeed in this respect. That’s why we as the trade unions are pushing for extraordinary plans for investment, public and private investment. It is the only way to manage the transition to a greener economy, towards a better digital environment in the economy, but also to create more jobs in general. And quality jobs means jobs that are protected, that have a decent salary, that have decent social protection, rights in the workplace, good working conditions, etc., etc. So, investment is the first keyword.

The second keyword is convergence, in the sense that we have an incredible wage gap today in the European Union, in the labour market, between different countries – east and west, south and north – but also within countries between different sectors. So, there is an issue regarding the need to push for a pay rise for European workers in general, but particularly for those countries that have been left behind. And, in this respect, there is a need to reinforce industrial relations and collective bargaining in each and every country, giving the possibility also to precarious workers in the digital economy, in the platforms, in the gig economy, to get access to trade unions to be able to organise themselves in trade unions and have the possibility to deliver proper collective bargaining to bargain better wages for themselves.

To get another perspective, we put the same question to Alexander Stubb, former Prime Minister and Finance Minister of Finland. In 2015, Stubb said Finland was the “sick man of Europe“, with unemployment at 10% and the lowest level of growth in the Eurozone. The country subsequently undertook a series of painful structural reforms (including cutting labour benefits) which supporters say have rescued the economy, though unions have dubbed the reforms “unjust”. How would he respond to Chiara?

We also had a comment from Willem, who is worried about a possible ‘race to the bottom’ in terms of labour law reforms. He calls for union-negotiated, EU-wide labour standards.

How would Luca Visentini, General Secretary of the European Trade Union Confederation, respond to Willem’s comment?

Well, Willem, the point is that, unfortunately, the European Union doesn’t have so much possibility to intervene on labour laws. Labour law is still a national matter, and Member States of the European Union are very jealous regarding their subsidiarity and autonomy and independence in this respect. But, nevertheless, there are two things that can be done; the first one is that through the so-called ‘semester process’ it’s possible for the European Union to recommend that the Member States go in the right direction in terms of labour reforms in a way such that rights can really cover each and every worker in each and every sector regardless of their working contract or status… This can be done. Unfortunately, in the past, the European Union has done exactly the opposite, in the sense that what was recommended was to fragment even more the labour market with so-called ‘structural reforms’. Now there is a different trend going on, fortunately, in the sense that after the so-called ‘European Pillar of Social Rights’ was proclaimed at the European level, now the European Union has started to recommend progressive reforms on the labour market.

There is also a second element to be considered: that, in any case, the European Union can establish some legal frameworks in terms of working conditions. Of course it cannot intervene on national matters, but it can set, let’s say, a minimum ‘floor’ of rights, some kind of ‘level playing field’ in terms of labour rights at the European level. And there are under discussion, by the way, exactly at this moment some new directives that are precisely going in this direction, in the sense of extending a minimum floor of rights to each and every type of worker in the European Union. So, there are some possible solutions.

Are worker rights under threat in the EU? How can we avoid a ‘race to the bottom’ in terms of labour law reforms? Let us know your thoughts and comments in the form below and we’ll take them to policymakers and experts for their reactions!

IMAGE CREDITS: (c) BigStock – vverve; PORTRAIT CREDITS: Luca Visentini: cc / Flickr – EU2017EE Estonian Presidency


8 comments Post a commentcomment

What do YOU think?

  1. avatar
    catherine benning

    Are worker rights under threat in the EU?

    Which workers rights are these? Are there any left?

  2. avatar
    EU Reform- Proactive

    Mr. Luca Visentini asks- instead to answer: “……. how to create quality jobs”…………?” So, Dear Mr. Luca V. & Mr. JCJ please lift the veil- what is the magic formula?

    Erecting more EU “Pillars”, more regulations, more strikes & more promises?

    The only jobs that come to mind that are protected, that have a decent salary, that have decent social protection, rights in the workplace, good working conditions, etc., etc. are those of (especially) EU politicians, their friends & their serving bureaucrats- who are setting their own scale of benefits.

    Or- do the army of working politicians need the protection of trade Unions as well?

    Should everyone study and strive to become a professional “politician” (many do) or leaders of some sorts of institutions- to reach such heavenly criteria?

    Toughies, the majority must play poker and acquire a multitude of skills to sail somehow through life and constantly prove their usefulness & economic worth in an ever changing & competitive economic environment.

    Are (EU) politicians disproportional unequal to “workers” & “accumulated” too may rights & benefits over time- paid by the taxes of these “workers”?

    Where does the threat come from?

  3. avatar
    Nadya

    No quite the opposite, the EU is there to improve the living standard of people across its territory and guarantee rights for workers and an acceptable work-life balance. The UK wants people to work over the limit per week, travel for hours in their supposed free time, not pay maternity leave etc. If you read back old debates that reducing worker rights was given as an incentive to vote out of the EU, so there you have your answer.

  4. avatar
    abodet

    Sure they are, Eu just want to impose everyone the Hartz laws.

  5. avatar
    Athena

    They started in Greece a few yrs ba k, already….guinea pigs

  6. avatar
    Michael

    Austerity and neoliberalism are designed to make the rich richer at the expense of everybody else

  7. avatar
    Anna

    Under threat yes…and underpaid…

  8. avatar
    Emre

    I enjoyed reading the article, very relevant topic. I think that one thing that the EU actively works on is workers’ rights. I don’t think that the EU is purposively or maliciously neglecting the right of workers, but constantly giving incremental improvements on already existing rights of workers. There are of course nation-specific issues which I personally find questionable, such as the high-income tax of workers in Germany, who sometimes have to pay up to 20% of their income (even on their Christmas bonus. I know, not very Christmas-like). All in all I find that the EU is heading towards the right direction with regards to worker’s rights, but it could do a bit more to promote a more standardized rights union across the whole of Europe.

Your email will not be published

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Notify me of new comments. You can also subscribe without commenting.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Privacy Policy unless you have disabled them. You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.