George Orwell believed a Socialist United States of Europe was the only truly worthwhile political objective.  He argued that most people associated “Socialism” with “higher wages, shorter hours, better houses, all-round social insurance, etc. etc.” (though he felt these benefits actually came about from the exploitation of colonial subjects). To some extent, the history of European integration has been a struggle between competing visions of Europe: the socialist Europe of worker rights and protections versus “a Europe built on Thatcherite ideals of liberty and Atlanticism”.

In reality, most EU leaders have been trying to strike a balance between these visions. In his first State of the Union speech in 2015, EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker announced he intended to create a “European Pillar of Social Rights”: “We have to step up the work for a fair and truly pan-European labour market. (…) As part of these efforts, I will want to develop a European Pillar of Social Rights, which takes account of the changing realities of Europe’s societies and the world of work. And which can serve as a compass for the renewed convergence within the euro area.”

What do our readers think? Has the balance tilted too far in favour of austerity, neoliberalism, and untrammelled free markets? We had a comment sent in from Chiara, who says she is concerned about workers being badly paid with poor job security in Europe today. How can the EU not just help create jobs, but help create high-quality jobs?

To get a response, we put Chiara’s comment to Luca Visentini, General Secretary of the European Trade Union Confederation (EUTC). What would he say?

Thank you Chiara for your question. There are two things in this question, the first one is how to create quality jobs, and of course if we don’t change the current macroeconomic policy of the European Union it will be very difficult to succeed in this respect. That’s why we as the trade unions are pushing for extraordinary plans for investment, public and private investment. It is the only way to manage the transition to a greener economy, towards a better digital environment in the economy, but also to create more jobs in general. And quality jobs means jobs that are protected, that have a decent salary, that have decent social protection, rights in the workplace, good working conditions, etc., etc. So, investment is the first keyword.

The second keyword is convergence, in the sense that we have an incredible wage gap today in the European Union, in the labour market, between different countries – east and west, south and north – but also within countries between different sectors. So, there is an issue regarding the need to push for a pay rise for European workers in general, but particularly for those countries that have been left behind. And, in this respect, there is a need to reinforce industrial relations and collective bargaining in each and every country, giving the possibility also to precarious workers in the digital economy, in the platforms, in the gig economy, to get access to trade unions to be able to organise themselves in trade unions and have the possibility to deliver proper collective bargaining to bargain better wages for themselves.

To get another perspective, we put the same question to Alexander Stubb, former Prime Minister and Finance Minister of Finland. In 2015, Stubb said Finland was the “sick man of Europe“, with unemployment at 10% and the lowest level of growth in the Eurozone. The country subsequently undertook a series of painful structural reforms (including cutting labour benefits) which supporters say have rescued the economy, though unions have dubbed the reforms “unjust”. How would he respond to Chiara?

We also had a comment from Willem, who is worried about a possible ‘race to the bottom’ in terms of labour law reforms. He calls for union-negotiated, EU-wide labour standards.

How would Luca Visentini, General Secretary of the European Trade Union Confederation, respond to Willem’s comment?

Well, Willem, the point is that, unfortunately, the European Union doesn’t have so much possibility to intervene on labour laws. Labour law is still a national matter, and Member States of the European Union are very jealous regarding their subsidiarity and autonomy and independence in this respect. But, nevertheless, there are two things that can be done; the first one is that through the so-called ‘semester process’ it’s possible for the European Union to recommend that the Member States go in the right direction in terms of labour reforms in a way such that rights can really cover each and every worker in each and every sector regardless of their working contract or status… This can be done. Unfortunately, in the past, the European Union has done exactly the opposite, in the sense that what was recommended was to fragment even more the labour market with so-called ‘structural reforms’. Now there is a different trend going on, fortunately, in the sense that after the so-called ‘European Pillar of Social Rights’ was proclaimed at the European level, now the European Union has started to recommend progressive reforms on the labour market.

There is also a second element to be considered: that, in any case, the European Union can establish some legal frameworks in terms of working conditions. Of course it cannot intervene on national matters, but it can set, let’s say, a minimum ‘floor’ of rights, some kind of ‘level playing field’ in terms of labour rights at the European level. And there are under discussion, by the way, exactly at this moment some new directives that are precisely going in this direction, in the sense of extending a minimum floor of rights to each and every type of worker in the European Union. So, there are some possible solutions.

Are worker rights under threat in the EU? How can we avoid a ‘race to the bottom’ in terms of labour law reforms? Let us know your thoughts and comments in the form below and we’ll take them to policymakers and experts for their reactions!

IMAGE CREDITS: (c) BigStock – vverve; PORTRAIT CREDITS: Luca Visentini: cc / Flickr – EU2017EE Estonian Presidency

26 comments Post a commentcomment

What do YOU think?

  1. avatar
    catherine benning

    Are worker rights under threat in the EU?

    Which workers rights are these? Are there any left?

    • avatar
      George Yiannitsiotis, PhD


  2. avatar
    EU Reform- Proactive

    Mr. Luca Visentini asks- instead to answer: “……. how to create quality jobs”…………?” So, Dear Mr. Luca V. & Mr. JCJ please lift the veil- what is the magic formula?

    Erecting more EU “Pillars”, more regulations, more strikes & more promises?

    The only jobs that come to mind that are protected, that have a decent salary, that have decent social protection, rights in the workplace, good working conditions, etc., etc. are those of (especially) EU politicians, their friends & their serving bureaucrats- who are setting their own scale of benefits.

    Or- do the army of working politicians need the protection of trade Unions as well?

    Should everyone study and strive to become a professional “politician” (many do) or leaders of some sorts of institutions- to reach such heavenly criteria?

    Toughies, the majority must play poker and acquire a multitude of skills to sail somehow through life and constantly prove their usefulness & economic worth in an ever changing & competitive economic environment.

    Are (EU) politicians disproportional unequal to “workers” & “accumulated” too may rights & benefits over time- paid by the taxes of these “workers”?

    Where does the threat come from?

  3. avatar

    No quite the opposite, the EU is there to improve the living standard of people across its territory and guarantee rights for workers and an acceptable work-life balance. The UK wants people to work over the limit per week, travel for hours in their supposed free time, not pay maternity leave etc. If you read back old debates that reducing worker rights was given as an incentive to vote out of the EU, so there you have your answer.

    • avatar
      Paul X

      And how exactly does the EU improve living standards for people?…it doesn’t generate any wealth, it simply takes money out of people’s pockets in the form of national contributions, VAT and tariff’s

      The EU can generate all the workers rights legislation it wants but somebody else ends up paying for it….that basically sums up the easy life of EU politicians, generating legislation without any fiscal responsibility for the consequences

  4. avatar

    Sure they are, Eu just want to impose everyone the Hartz laws.

  5. avatar

    They started in Greece a few yrs ba k, already….guinea pigs

  6. avatar

    Austerity and neoliberalism are designed to make the rich richer at the expense of everybody else

  7. avatar

    Under threat yes…and underpaid…

  8. avatar

    I enjoyed reading the article, very relevant topic. I think that one thing that the EU actively works on is workers’ rights. I don’t think that the EU is purposively or maliciously neglecting the right of workers, but constantly giving incremental improvements on already existing rights of workers. There are of course nation-specific issues which I personally find questionable, such as the high-income tax of workers in Germany, who sometimes have to pay up to 20% of their income (even on their Christmas bonus. I know, not very Christmas-like). All in all I find that the EU is heading towards the right direction with regards to worker’s rights, but it could do a bit more to promote a more standardized rights union across the whole of Europe.

  9. avatar
    Michael Watkins

    The EU exists for the exploitation of weaker and poorer states like Greece by stronger and richer states like Germany.

  10. avatar

    this is a sore point giving the neoliberal stance prevailng in the EU (both national and union level)

  11. avatar

    Here’s a picture of the political world talking about the economic situation. EU economy is a two lane highway. Schengen countries and non Schengen. And non Schengen part of Europe is largely disregarded in all comments from policy makers. Sure enough it’s a very slippery slope and they steer away… The question implies the rights of those at the very base of the pyramid… And inherently the need to maximise profit by their employer… Lobby is way simpler locally. So Eu will hardly be able to have a saying any time soon… For the non paid taxes by the biggest companies who has to step in? The little guys… The ants… We try to talk rights but they filter through profit. So, are the rights in danger? Yes. They will always be!

  12. avatar

    No. That’s where they are better protected.

  13. avatar

    What does this mean ?
    Who are these “workers”…..does it exclude managers, directors, CEOs etc..these are workers too… are the vast majority of shareholders.

  14. avatar

    Of course Corporations have a terrible behavior

  15. avatar

    “Workers ” are just taxpayers who are paying EU bureaucracy!

    • avatar

      Anelia – Exactly and the tragic joke is that they are acting like they care…

  16. avatar

    I think yes because of Globalism.
    Many companies have to compete with companies from other parts of the World with different social systems, different salaries, different worker rights. Many companies want to reduce the labour cost so their products to be more competitive. Reducing labour cost often means fewer worker rights.

    • avatar

      Aris – Bad bargain. Lower wages, lower spending power and every company sells the majority of its services/product on the internal market

    • avatar

      Olivier – let’s say that does little to avoid it…

  17. avatar

    Everybody talks about rights but nobody about obligations.

  18. avatar

    No, quite the opposite, workers rights and unions are being used to attack democracy and actually make life worse to who really produce.

Your email will not be published

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Notify me of new comments. You can also subscribe without commenting.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Privacy Policy unless you have disabled them. You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.